Type Polarity Maps
from
Presenting Type Dynamically
Jeanne Marlowe, M.A. INFP
www.personalitypathways.com/marlowe
Polarity maps of the functions show the strengths (+) (upper quadrants) and weaknesses (-) (lower quadrants). Participants see how their greatest strength--their dominant--can become a vulnerability when it's overused. They begin to see the limitations of their perspective and the need for that of their least preferred function. Treating the functions as polarities to be managed focuses attention on identifying when a shift is needed.
Adapted
from Johnson, B. (1992). Polarity management. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
Data-gathering Functions
|
strengths (+) |
strengths (+)
|
| clarify "what is" to solve problems experientially | imagine new perspectives to generate options |
| observe carefully | see possibilities |
| detail step by step plan | achieve visionary insight |
| deal with the known | discover new meaning |
|
|
|
|
weaknesses (-) |
weaknesses (-)
|
| view things simplistically | ignore crucial details |
| become locked into a single solution | underestimate time and effort required |
| rush to complete tasks | neglect present |
| dislike planning for future | dislike coping with routine |
Decision-making Functions
|
strengths (+) |
strengths (+)
|
| establish structure and order | focus on harmony and positive atmosphere |
| explain theory and principles | relate to personal experience |
| analyze logically | respond timely and tactfully |
| organize according to impersonal standards | affirm personal values |
|
|
|
|
weaknesses (-) |
weaknesses (-)
|
| ignore impact on people | ignore data that could disrupt harmony |
| devalue ideas/people who don't fit theory | take things personally |
| neglect relationship-building | avoid confrontation, cater to others at own expense |
| fail to see values implied by actions | fail to consider consequences |
